Science fiction futures and ancient Rome are two periods on the human timeline that seem to be on complete opposite ends of the spectrum. However, in Blade Runner, Ridley Scott and his filmmaking team found a way to blend these two periods in time to make a film that is both an homage to the past and a dreary prediction of the near future. To dive deeper, Scott’s production team found a clever way to use the architecture of the past and fabricated gadgets of the future to create a fictional world in which the layers of a building’s construction tell a story as strong as the dialogue coming out of the actor’s mouth. In this essay I will discuss the architectural details of the present-day Bradbury Building, the futuristic Bradbury building of Blade Runner, and where the building’s architectural elements are derived from. A precious metals miner named Lewis L. Bradbury commissioned an architect named Sumner P. Hunt to design the Bradbury Building. The building exists at 304 Broadway, West 3rd Street in Los Angeles, California. However, after viewing Sumner’s designs, L. L. Bradbury decided to commission George Herbert Wyman, a young draftsman who worked for Sumner, to design the building instead. Built in 1893, the Bradbury Building would become a multistory structure that would be used as office, retail, and residential spaces (Duane). Due to the building’s very exotic interior, it would also be used by filmmakers in their films for years to come, including Ridley Scott’s 1982 Blade Runner. When comparing the interior and exterior of the Bradbury Building in the present to the interior and exterior of the Bradbury Building in Blade Runner, the added height, added post and lintel pillars along with metal tubing covering the façade of the Bradbury Building are the major changes made to the futuristic version of the building. Originally constructed in the Romanesque revival architecture style, the Bradbury Building’s exterior façade features wide and round archways with pilasters on either end of the archway that act as decorative columns. The columns, acting as the piers of the arch, resemble the Corinthian style order that line roman archways with leaf-carved ornamental motifs called Acanthuses (Britannica). The archway itself is made up of long curved sections of brown brick as opposed to an array of vertical bricks, or voussoirs, of classical roman archways. The acting keystone of the Bradbury Building is more of a decorative depiction of an acanthus rather than an important structural element of the archway. Atop the archway, there is a post and lintel structure comprised of the decorative pilasters and an ornate lintel that reads “BRADBURY” (Nelson, figure 1). In Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner, the front façade of the futuristic Bradbury Building is layered with structural and decorative elements that depict the passage of time over many years of renovation and repair. There is no archway, but there is a post and lintel structure that extends out over the sidewalk with a giant ornate lintel that reads “BRADBURY”, like the present-day Bradbury Building. Underneath the lintel are two pillars with wide swirl-fluted shafts on either end of the lintel and an exquisite array of pipes and tubes cover the once exposed brick walls of the Bradbury Building (Nanev figure 2). The interior of the present-day Bradbury Building features walls that resemble the exterior façade of a building. Here, the Romanesque revival is evoked again with archways that surround some of the windows and doorways (Nelson). These arches, unlike the arches that decorate the Bradbury’s exterior entryways, are made up of an array of vertical voussoirs that point out from the center of the archway with its keystone being the most vertical. Again, we see that decorative brick pilasters line the will every few meters (Nelson, figure 3). Also, the interior of the Bradbury Building features stair railings with iron art nouveau decorations and wooden handrails. Even the elevators in the main lobby of the building are exposed iron cages. The exposed iron and façade-like walls of the interior of the building are meant to resemble an outside busy city street which clearly comes across with the aid of the rooftop atrium that allows sunlight to flood the lobby (Nelson, figure 4). In Blade Runner, much of the interior architecture is left as if untouched from the 1980’s, only filled with junk that relates to the story of the film. However, one key difference between the future depiction of the Bradbury Building and the present-day Bradbury is the number of floors that were built. Originally, the Bradbury Building was built with 5 stories, but in Blade Runner the filmmakers decided to fill the lobby with smoke to imply that there are more stories to the building (Nanev, figure 5a and 5b). I will also be comparing the present-day version of the Bradbury Building to two other buildings that were discussed in this course, which are the Arch of Constantine in Rome, and the Pantheon, also in Rome. When comparing the exterior façade of the Bradbury Building to the Arch of Constantine, there are both stark similarities and notable differences between the two structures. The similarities being that both structures feature a post and lintel decorative facing over an arch with piers and a decorative keystone. The major difference between the two structures is that the façade of Arch of Constantine is constructed in the classical (late) roman style with more detailed features such as the fluted shaft of the tapered columns compared to the symmetrical and rectangular shape of the Bradbury’s pilasters. The arch of Constantine is also decorated with more detailed carvings depicting specific scenes and text all over the wall as opposed to the Bradbury Building whose details are localized at the top of the columns and over its archway (Constantine, Arch, figure 6). When comparing the Bradbury Building the Pantheon in Rome, the initial inclination is that these two structures look nothing alike. However, there are as many similarities as differences between these two structures. For example, the interior architectural elements from the Pantheon, such as the decorative columns and rounded arches can be observed at the Bradbury building on its decorative interior façade. And although the Pantheon has a rounded dome – which is the opposite of the Bradbury Building’s overall cube shape structure and triangular prism-shaped atrium – it shares a similar architectural structure to the Bradbury Building: a rooftop hole to let in light. At the Pantheon, the hole at the top center of the dome is called an oculus. The oculus is surrounded by coffer which is a square or polygonal ornamental sunken panel used to decorate a ceiling (Agrippa). At the Bradbury Building, the rooftop light hole is called an atrium which is made up of glass panels and stretches across almost the entire ceiling, as opposed to the Pantheon which has only a hole at the top of its dome. The Bradbury Building, however, features a series of iron mixed with wood handrails, unlike the pantheon which is just an open marble floor space (Agrippa, Pantheon, figure 7). To conclude, the Bradbury Building of present day is clearly inspired from ancient roman architecture, but with key differences in construction and decoration due to the vastly different time periods of ancient Rome and our present-day culture. It is understood that with the passage of time comes new building methods, new art styles, and new humans all with different perspectives that are imbedded into whatever building is created making that building a product of its time. Ridley Scott and his filmmaking team then found a creative way to speed up that process of rebuilding a building by using existing architectural elements and futuristic details to create a world that is curiously familiar and distantly foreign at the same time. Figure 1, Nelson Figure 2, Nanev Figure 3, Nelson Figure 4, Nelson Figure 5a, Nanev Figure 5b, Nanev Figure 6, Constantine, Arch Figure 7, Agrippa, Pantheon WORKS CITED
Los Angeles Conservancy. Bradbury Building Overview, The Los Angeles Conservancy Copyright 2020 https://www.laconservancy.org/locations/bradbury-building. Accessed 7 April 2021. Curated by Duane, Erin. UC Davis Library. EXHIBITS – Bradbury Family Papers A Mexican-American Family’s Story, 1876-1965, previously on display Jul 1 – Sep 1, 2007 in Shields Library Lobby – Special Collections, https://www.library.ucdavis.edu/exhibit/bradbury-family-papers-mexican-american-familys-story-1876-1965/. Accessed 7 April 2021. Nelson, Joshua. Elevator Scene. The Bradbury Building | One of a Kind Filigree Elevator and Central Atrium, November 10, 2018, https://www.elevatorscenestudio.com/blog/2018/11/10/bradbury-building-elevator. Accessed 7 April 2021. The Editors of the Encyclopedia Britannica. Britannica. Order. July 20, 1998, https://www.britannica.com/technology/order-architecture. Accessed 9 April 2021. Commissioned by Agrippa, Marcus. Pantheon. 25 BC. Rome, Italy. https://www.askideas.com/media/39/Interior-Of-The-Pantheon-Picture.jpg. Accessed 9 April 2021. Commissioned by Roman Senate to Constantine. Arch of Constantine. 312 AD. Rome, Italy. https://colosseumrometickets.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Rome-Italy.-Arch-of-Constantine-ancient-construction-of-emperor-victory-over-Maxentius-in-312AD-Roman-Empire..jpg. Accessed 9 April 2021. Nanev, Svetlozar. “Blade Runner Bradbury Scene.” YouTube, uploaded by Scetlozar Nanev, 22 May 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8L_HCLHcv2E&t=25s
1 Comment
To begin, many of Linklaters film also pose the question, “how do we understand another’s subjective truth?”, Linklater’s Waking Life answers this philosophical journey through Wiley Wiggin’s dreams. There is a scene in the film where Kim Krizan speaks to Wiley about the spiritual communion one feels when there is a sense of understanding between two humans. I find this scene to be like sonny Davis’ Texas map sequence in its use of documentary style approach to the telling of the story and the context of subjective truth and one’s ability to understand another person’s subjective truth. In waking life, as Kim speaks, Wiley sits and seems to be an engaged listener. He is actively trying to understand Kim as she explains the feelings one experiences when there is a sense of understanding. The sense of understanding that Wiley is trying to feel is the same sense of understanding that Linklater is asking his audience to feel when Sonny Davis speaks about Texas. Linklater sets up the interview with Sonny by showing shots of a BBQ restaurant, then shots of a server serving a plate of BBQ. This restaurant is a place where people some together and – as we can see in the background characters – talk to each other. This gives the audience the feeling that they are about to sit down with a friend and have a relaxing afternoon eating comfort food and getting to know each other. Sonny Davis’ character is introduced and although Sonny’s dialogue seems stereotypical and may be offensive to some, it is spoken honestly and is true to his character as a Texan. For example, there is a sense of understanding between Texans when you call Houston the “carcinogenic coast”, a phrase only those native to that area will understand. Richard Linklater, acting as both the documentarian interviewing Sonny and the filmmaker who co-wrote Sonny’s dialogue, asks that the audience listen to what Sonny, and the rest of Carthage, has to say. It is through the dialogue of whomever you are communicating with that you will find a sense of understanding. In this example, Linklater is providing the dialogue in the form of a documentary interview. Although Sonny seems to be speaking to no one, there is a human connection between Sonny and the interviewer which allows both people to be comfortable and more easily understand each other.
The next scene I will be going over is when Bernie is shoots and kills Mrs. Nugent then continues to live his life as if nothing happened. However, instead of human connection leading to understanding, these scenes from Bernie and A Scanner Darkly show how there is a lack of understanding when there is a disingenuous connection between people. After murdering Mrs. Nugent, Bernie continued to be kind and generously donate money to various parts of his community, as it easier to live with guilt when those around you are convinced that you are a saint. Bernie’s ability to hide behind his kindness left the Carthage townsfolk with an understanding that Bernie has the kindest soul which could do no harm. As Danny Buck comes into the picture and attempts to convict Bernie, we see that Bernie’s reputation convinces the entire town of Carthage that Bernie should not serve punishment for committing the murder due to all his kindness and generosity previously mentioned. Danny buck, being the fair District Attorney that he is, attempts to help Carthage understand that although Bernie has been kind to most everyone, he still killed Mrs. Nugent and hid her body until it would be found – which is a crime of the highest degree. When comparing this scene to A Scanner Darkly, the main character (Bob Arctor) is an undercover cop posing as a mole inside of a drug ring. To fit the role of the mole character, Bob starts to use a drug called Substance D. He eventually gets addicted to this drug which leads to his dismissal from the police force. In the same vein as Bernie, this is an example of a character committing an illegal act and using a lack of human connection to try and get away with it. Bernie hid behind his kindness and generosity to make himself look good in the eyes of the townspeople while Bob used his scanner suit (a suit/device that makes the wearer impossible to identify) and his role as a mole to justify his drug addiction. This made it difficult for outside people to understand the nature of these characters, which therefore made it easier for these characters to get away scot free. It was not until Bernie and Bob were confronted by people who understand the nuances of decision making and that harmful decisions must be atoned for by those who commit them. It was a lack of understanding that convinced the town of Carthage to stand by Bernie at all costs, but that lack of understanding is the town’s subjective truth, so it is the responsibility of the audience member to understand that subjective truth. There can still be a sense of understanding despite the differences in opinions people have, and a way to reach that understanding is to connect to your fellow human by communicating with them. The final scene I will be analyzing to show how human connection can be a path to understanding another person’s subjective truth is when Bernie is shown at trial giving his testimony of the murder and how the townspeople reacted to the decision. We see Danny Buck present Bernie as a “calculating evil actor” while Scrappy Holmes (Bernie’s Lawyer) presents Bernie as a man who made a horrible mistake, but was too cowardly to turn himself in. Bernie is found guilty of murder and gets sentenced to life in prison which upsets the townspeople to the point where they refuse to accept Bernie’s fate. Linklater then brings us back to Sonny, where he criticizes the intelligence of the jury in fear of them convicting Bernie of murder. Then, Bernie meets an on friend at a prison visitation where the friend just assumes that Bernie can leave jail at will. And finally, the old woman at the end of the film says that if Bernie were “truly sorry for what he did, God would forgive him and that is all that really matters”. Most everyone believes that murder is a horrible crime that should not ever be committed, however, by giving a voice to the people of Carthage, Linklater shows his audience the humanity that lives within Carthage. The subjective truth of Carthage townsfolk is that Bernie was a not only a kind servant to his community, but also a loyal friend to the people who reside in that community. As awful as murder is, Linklater wants his audience to understand that the people of Carthage had a very personal and deeply intimate relationship with Bernie, which is why they were able to shrug off “mean old” Mrs. Nugent’s death as if she is of equal value to them dead or alive. This type of understanding can only come when you get direct dialogue from the people involved in a situation. Being that Linklater is from east Texas and attended Bernie’s trial in person, he can better understand the subjective truth of the Carthage townspeople as opposed to someone who is from outside of the community. By adapting this story into a film, Linklater shows real Carthage townsfolk and provides this one-way form of human connection via documentary style storytelling so that the audience can develop their opinions about Bernie based on anecdotes from the people who lived through the situation. The only way to understand someone’s subjective truth is to get them to talk about it and listen to their point of view. In Linklater’s Last flag flying, there is also an instance where hearing one’s subjective truth led to an understanding that could only have been obtained by hearing the subjective truth from the person who lived that truth. Larry “Doc” Shepherd is a war veteran who lost his son, Larry, in the Iraq war. Having also lost his wife, Doc looks to his old war buddies for solace as he grieves over his son. At the end of the film, Doc reads a letter from Larry that he wrote before he died. Doc spent the entire film trying to grieve for Larry, but after reading the letter there is a visible moment of catharsis for Doc because he was then able to understand why Larry chose to go to war and the feelings Larry had for the possibility of his death. Although this is an example of an unorthodox form of human connection, it is the only form of connection that was available to Doc now that Larry is dead. So, having read Larry’s own personal thoughts, Doc was able to understand Larry’s subjective truth – which is that it was an honor to die for his country; and the understanding of that subjective truth is what allowed Doc to peacefully accept his son’s death. In conclusion, human connection is a common theme in many of Richard Linklater’s films. In Bernie, Linklater gives a voice to real people from Carthage and has them tell their story to the audience so that the audience can connect with these people in hopes of understanding why they feel so strongly about Bernie Teide; and by presenting the people of Carthage through the lens of a documentary, Linklater cements the credibility of these people so that the audience can truly listen to the subjective truths of the people of Carthage in hopes of establishing a sense of understanding. Works Cited Boyd, Katrina G. “Greif Tragically Becoming Comedy.” Film Quarterly, Vol. 68, No. 3 (Spring 2015), pp. 48-52. Columbia College Chicago Library, https://doi-org.colum.idm.oclc.org/10.1525/fq.2015.68.3.48. Waking Life. Directed by Richard Linklater, Fox Searchlight, 2001. A Scanner Darkly. Directed by Richard Linklater, Warner Bros., 2006. Last Flag Flying. Directed by Richard Linklater, Amazon Studios, 2017. Krzysztof Kieslowski employs various filmmaking techniques to show the different ways that his characters from the Three colors Trilogy: Blue, White, & Red, and from The Double Life of Veronique engage with their reality. Whether it is engagement with the self, or with the outside world, this engagement often elicits the most intimately private human emotions & experiences from his characters. These elicited emotions are then articulated by whatever film technique(s) that Kieslowski employed for that scene.
My first example of Kieslowski employing filmmaking techniques to convey character engagement with their reality is depicted in The Double Life of Veronique. Weronika expresses to her father that, for some odd reason, she has a “strange feeling” that does not feel alone in the world. Later in the film, Weronika catches a glimpse of her doppelganger, Veronique. During this captivating moment, all Weronika’s focus is directed toward the impeccable resemblance between her and Veronique. Weronika seems to be completely oblivious to the political strife unfolding in the background. Kieslowski places Weronika in front of a barricade of armed & shielded police; shallow focus is used so that Weronika’s entire upper body is in focus, while having the blockade of police in the background and out of focus. By having an in-focus Weronika in front of an out-of-focus gang of police Kieslowski effectively shows that Weronika’s enchantment with the sight of Veronique is fulfilling her “strange feeling” of not feeling alone in the world. The way Weronika’s “strange feeling” encompasses her to the point of oblivion is the same way that any human’s own internal issue is attended to before any other endogenous issue. Weronika pauses for a moment to watch as a bus, who carries Veronique, drives away. Weronika is so utterly mesmerized by the figure in front of her eyes that the sociopolitical conflict of her country means nothing to her in this moment. There can be an argument made for the degree to which politics plays a role in an individual’s life. For some people, politics may be a domineering force which dictates the every-day decisions of their life, but for the rest of society, politics may merely feel like a subtle entity that provides a bubble in which its inhabitants can operate in. Although this bubble of the political sphere seems insignificant, it ultimately dictates what a person can or cannot do within their society, so in a way, politics affects everyone in its society to a degree. For Weronika, her momentary reflective pause amidst the disastrous political turmoil indicates her lack of concern for how society is changing at that moment. The only thing that matters to Weronika is that her feeling of companionship to a doppelganger now has a tangible veracity to it due her the detection of Veronique. This moment in The Double Life of Veronique shows how an individual realizing their intuitive senses were correct can become so captivating that an individual becomes completely oblivious to their immediate surroundings. My second example of Kieslowski employing filmmaking techniques to convey character engagement with their reality occurs in Blue when Julie is sitting on the hospital porch right before a woman intrudes and attempts to ask her questions about her dead husband. Here, Kieslowski uses sound, lights, camera movement, character eyeline, and production design to convey both an engagement with a strange reality and Julie’s engagement with grief. At first, we see Julie resting on a chair in an outside porch, then a wave of classical music awakens Julie from her slumber. Then, the eyeline of the now alarmed Julie follows the camera as it tracks back and forth; we can see Julie make momentary eye contact with the camera (or perhaps the audience). Julie’s eye contact implies that she sees something that wasn’t there before, perhaps a different world or even a separate dimension within her own reality. The classical music that startles Julie is a recurring sonic motif used as an indication for Julie re-experiencing the grief of her dead family. In this scene, there is no explanation to show that the music that Julie reacts to is diegetic, so there should be no reason for Julie to be reacting to sounds at all unless the music is coming from inside Julie’s head. Julie’s reaction to what could be diegetic or non-diegetic sound is Kieslowski’s way of showing how a person who has lost a loved one can experience random bursts of feeling that remind them of their deepest griefs. In this scene, the color blue is extremely prevalent. Blue is a color that connects Julie to her deceased family members, especially Julie’s daughter. In this same scene, Kieslowski uses a blue light (that seems to penetrate through blue tinted window panels) to burn the frame and fill Julie with an overwhelming blue atmosphere. By using the blue light to engulf Julie, Kieslowski shows that the feeling of grieving over a loved one is so engrossing and overpowering that it can occupy the entire world around you. My third example of Krzysztof Kieslowski’s employment of filmmaking techniques to convey character engagement with their realiry is embedded within the story told in White – which is Kieslowski’s second feature from the Three Colors Trilogy. There is a moment in the film when Karol is tasked to do something incredibly difficult – to kill the extremely depressed and suicidal Mikolaj. In a moment of clever thinking, Karol uses a blank bullet to trick Mikolaj into thinking that he has shot him. This near-death experience that Mikolaj goes through then convinces him to change his mind about suicide and allows him to live his life anew. Here, one of the more prominent filmmaking techniques that Kieslowski employs is the editing of time within the story. Kieslowski uses the editing to slow down the time it takes for Mikolaj to fall the ground after he’s been “shot”. This momentary suspension of time accurately conveys what Mikolaj must be experiencing since he believes that he has just been shot. The halt of time allows for not only Mikolaj, but also the audience to be suspended in their own disbelief. For a short moment, Mikolaj experienced the intensity of ceasing to exist. Yes, Mikolaj wanted “less” pain, which is why he asked Karol to take his life, but what Mikolaj has realized shortly after nearly dying is that pain is not the only thing that goes away after death. There are other human passions that evacuate the soul after death such as euphoria, joy, laughter, comradery, and love. Mikolaj realizes that these human passions will bring so much more fulfillment than any releasement of pain would, which then leads him to choose life rather than suicide. To comment on character motivation of the same scene in White, Kieslowski indirectly conveys Karol’s contemplation over a human life by acting as a guardian savior for a stranger. An example of this is when Mikolaj’s physical body is falling to the ground after it is “shot” by Karol. Karol was given the option to shoot and kill Mikolaj with a promise for a large sum of money; but Karol’s conscious decision to load a blank in the barrel of his gun convinces me to believe that at some point outside of the on-screen story Karol was contemplating Mikolaj’s salvation. Deciding the fate of entire human life is no simple task; and among the people who are privileged that task are police, soldiers, doctors, political figures, judicial figures, and teachers – all professions which require an individual to occupy a stressful environment. Karol must have accumulated an unwanted an immense stress that weighed on his shoulders due to the contemplation of whether he should take a human’s life. This off-screen contemplation with a human life is Kieslowski’s way of indirectly showing how the decisions of a pressing issue will mean nothing if those decisions are not acted upon; and once Karol acted upon his decision to save Mikolaj, not only did he receive a large sum of money, Karol also received a lifelong friend who continued to aid his endeavors. My final example of Kieslowski employing filmmaking techniques to convey character engagement with reality is explored in Red, Kieslowski’s final film of the Three Color Trilogy. Kieslowski explores the degree to which seemingly everyday decisions effect other humans. By having the Judge watch a newscast of a tragic ferry accident, Kieslowski shows how not only a character in the film engages with their reality, but also forces the audience to engage with the reality within the story. At the end of the film, all the main characters from the entire Three Colors Trilogy miraculously come together as survivors of a tragic ferry accident. The filmmaking technique that Kieslowski employs is the use of newsreel. By using newsreel, Kieslowski convincingly depicts a one in a billion chance that the accident could be a real event. Kieslowski wants to let the audience know that human beings “Influence people around us whether we know them or not.”; and by using newsreel, an extra layer of authenticity and unblemished realness is added when we see handheld cameras capturing the ferry accident. The engagement with reality is reinforced by using newsreel because now the audience is involved. The audience member gets to watch these same tragic events on the television as if they were at home watching the news. This makes an audience member think that an event like this could occur in their own reality outside the movie screen. Kieslowski effectively asks the audience member “what if this were to happen to me?”. When a mother watches news coverage of a child dying of unnatural causes, the first thought that pops in that mother’s head is the safety of their child and how devastated they would be if their child died of unnatural causes. When the audience member watches newsreel of the mysteriously miraculous survival of the characters the audience member may ask themselves, “what if an event such as this one happens to me”, or “have my past decisions led me to event like this before”. So, by using newsreel Kieslowski is effectively showing character engagement with reality within the story told in Red and even forces the audience member to think about their own ideas of reality. In conclusion, Krzysztof Kieslowski was a director who employed a variety of filmmaking techniques to exhibit the way in which his characters engage with the reality within their story. The characters’ engagement with their reality often elicit intimate human emotions; and it is those human emotions that Kieslowski wants to show to his audience. WORKS CITED Three Colors: Blue. Dir. Krzysztof Kieslowski. The Criterion Collection, 1993. Kanopy. Web. 9 Dec. 2019. Three Colors: White. Dir. Krzysztof Kieslowski. The Criterion Collection, 1993. Kanopy. Web. 9 Dec. 2019. Three Colors: Red. Dir. Krzysztof Kieslowski. The Criterion Collection, 1993. Kanopy. Web. 9 Dec. 2019. The Double Life of Veronique. Dir. Krzysztof Kieslowski. The Criterion Collection, 1991. Kanopy. Web. 9 Dec. 2019. Kikasola, Joseph G. The Films of Krzysztof Kieslowski: the liminal image. New York, NY, The Continuum International Publishing Group, 2004. K. Special K. Super K. Vitamin K. Cat Valium. Cat Tranquilizer. Kit kat. Street names of the generic FDA approved drug that’ll leave you dragging your piss-filled half comatose corpse along hallway walls in hopes of encountering a toilet. Ketamine. One might ask, “Should I try Ketamine? If so, do I snort it? Do I eat it? Do I fill a clean and sterile needle with Ketamine juice and inject it straight into my eyeballs?”. Well, person reading this, all your suggested questions (and more) will be answered in the short essay below. I wrote this essay for the coolest college class ever called “Drugs and the Brain”. Ever since then I’ve been liberally dosing my morning smoothies with a Ketamine-infused kombucha. It is now August 7th, 2022, and the voices in my head could not be happier with my decision. Cheers! “K?”, the voices whisper to me. “K.”, I solemnly reply. ______________________________________________________________________________ Ketamine was originally developed for anesthetic purposes in 1962. Following its release for public use in 1970, Ketamine quickly became a drug of recreation for those in the “club” or “rave” culture. This essay will highlight the recreational use of Ketamine and the chemical effects it has on the brain, the effects it has on its users, and the effects it has on society. When Ketamine is administered into the human body, there are several ways in which the drug can get into the bloodstream. Ketamine can be administered intravenously, intramuscularly, orally, nasally, rectally, or subcutaneously. The intranasal method of administration is by far the most popular method, with 99% of users taking the intranasal route of administration (Reynaud-Maurupt, Bello, Akoka, & Toufik 2007). Although the intranasal route of administration is the most popular, it is not the most efficient. The intravenous method of administration is considered to be the “ideal route” (Li & Vlisides, 2016) because this form of administration dumps the Ketamine right into the bloodstream thus shortening the time it takes for the drug to get into the brain. With a distribution half-life of 10 minutes (Sassano-Hoggins, Baron, Juarez, Esmaili, & Gold, 2016), Ketamine quickly travels throughout the body and ultimately leaves an accumulated concentration of it in the brain. At the chemical level, once Ketamine passes through the blood brain barrier, it reaches the lipid membrane in which the brain’s receptors are located. Ketamine then antagonizes NMDA receptors by binding to a site within the channel pore to reduce the amount of time the channel is open; ketamine can also allosterically antagonize the NMDA receptor by decreasing the channel opening frequency (Li, Vlisides, 2016). By mediating the amount of NMDA that passes through brain cells, Ketamine effectively modulates emotional responses, learning, and memory. Along with being an antagonist for NMDA, Ketamine also increases the activity of Dopamine, Norepinephrine, and Serotonin (Sassano-Hoggins et al., 2016). Ketamine is also an agonist for the Opium receptors in the brain, leading to analgesic and euphoric effects that are mediated through Opium receptors (Sassano-Hoggins et al., 2016). At the clinical level, Ketamine proves to be a useful anesthetic and provides profound analgesia and sedation without significantly compromising respiratory function. However, users reported having unpleasant experiences such as a longer time coming out of anesthesia, increased frequency of unpleasant dreams, and hallucinations; the increasing quantity of these unpleasant reports led to a decline in medical Ketamine use for humans. At lower doses, Ketamine will give its users hallucinations, distortions of time and space, and mild disassociation (Li, Vlisides, 2016). Other symptoms of higher, yet, subanesthetic doses of Ketamine include a psychedelic state of mind resembling schizophrenic psychosis, pronounced derealization & depersonalization, alterations in bodily perception, impairments in proprioception, and preoccupation with unimportant sounds (Sassano-Hoggins et al., 2016). As dosage increases, Ketamine users report having feelings of intoxication, perceptual alterations in auditory and visual senses, symptoms of depression or derealization, referential ideas & delusions, misinterpretations, and thought disorder (Li. Vlisides, 2016). A high dosage of Ketamine may also include schizophrenia-like symptoms and perceptions that are completely separate from reality (Li, Vlisides, 2016). High dosages of Ketamine lead to a feeling that many users call being “lost in the K-hole” (Sassano-Hoggins et al., 2016). The K-hole is what Ketamine users refer to when they are in an extreme state of disassociation. Users feel as if they are exiting out of their own body. Often, this “K-hole” experience is undesired as it is associated with a feeling of morbidity (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). Other undesirable effects may include, but are not limited to, dizziness, loss of one’s senses, vomiting, inability to communicate, anxiety & distress, blackouts & comas, weight loss, joint pain, and gingivitis (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). According to users, the risks connected with Ketamine use are mainly of social or psychosocial nature. These risks include, but are not limited to, the inability to defend oneself, inability to feel pain, losing control of oneself, anxiety, hallucinatory troubles, disorientation, depressive symptoms, and memory troubles (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). Because these risks are so dangerously debilitating, the usage of Ketamine inhibits the user from reacting properly in the event of an emergency. Due to this lack of reaction, the use of Ketamine has been linked to assaults, rapes, and domestic accidents (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). Long term use of Ketamine can lead to a host of cognitive deficits such as schizophrenia-like symptoms, cognitive impairment in working memory, impairment in long & short term memory, persistent dissociative & depressive disorder, and delusional thinking (Sassano-Hoggins et al., 2016). Aside from the negative cognitive effects of chronic Ketamine use, there are also physiological detriments that manifest due to the prolonged consumption of Ketamine. Chronic users of Ketamine report lower urinary tract symptoms such as dysuria, suprapubic pain, painful hematuria, and moderate to intense abdominal pain which is caused by Ketamine induced toxicity to the gastrointestinal system (Sassano-Hoggins et al., 2016). Only a year after the release of the public use of Ketamine, reports of the recreational misuse of the drug began to be documented; the reports of Ketamine misuse increased during the 1990’s (Sassano-Hoggins et al., 2016) mainly being concentrated at raves, clubs, festivals, or parties. Ketamine use was almost entirely restricted to the United States, but after 1980, the drug went international and rose to prominence as a “club drug” (Sassano-Hoggins et al., 2016). Ketamine quickly assimilated itself into “rave” culture because it allowed its users to hallucinate and fall into a stimulated sense of euphoria (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). After a rave when the music is dying down and the attendees are exiting the venue, Ketamine users will often take the drug when they feel like their initial high is coming down to “keep the party going” (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). Many people who a part of this “rave” or “dance culture” tend to be polydrug users, often mixing Ketamine with other substances such as LSD, alcohol, and amphetamines. The purpose of mixing these substances is to maximize hallucinogenic effects while minimizing anesthetic effects (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). In a set of data that was collected between July 2002 and June 2003, 70% of respondents were recruited through the techno-festival scene, while 30% were recruited through addiction centers and treatment organizations. Among these respondents, Ketamine was generally a substance that was experimented with or used by polydrug users, meaning that Ketamine was most likely being mixed with other psychoactive drugs during sessions of administration (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). 40% of these users claimed to have taken Ketamine 2-9 times during their lifetime, while 41% of users claimed to have taken Ketamine 10 or more times. Of the 41% group, users were more likely to be male, living alone, in precarious living conditions, and having no job nor unemployment benefits (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). If an individual is a part of the rave culture, the amount of times the individual takes Ketamine correlates with the amount of times that person has been to a techno fest. According to a data set of n=249 respondents, a group who had taken less than 10 doses of Ketamine in their lifetime had 72% of individuals attend 10 techno festivals or less, with 41% attending more than 10 festivals. By comparison, the group who had taken 10 or more doses of ketamine in their lifetime had 23% of individuals attend 10 techno festivals or less, with 59% attending more than 10 festivals (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). Aside from the experience of a trippy rave or a crazy party, users also take Ketamine for its spiritual benefits. Users report feeling detached from oneself or going through a regeneration, causing feelings of lightness, floating, calming, and euphoria (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). Although the out of body experience is a feeling that is more often endured than sought after, the introspection that this feeling generates seems to be beneficial for some individuals. These individuals claim to find “hidden dimensions” of oneself by opening “doors to a reality you wouldn’t see otherwise” and claiming that Ketamine “puts you face to face with your own self” (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). This allows for users to reflect on their own life without having to filter their inner thoughts & emotions through their past emotions or past experiences. Regarding the production and distribution of Ketamine, if an individual doesn’t have a “nurse friend” who can smuggle Ketamine out of a lab, the individual must resort to using outside sources to get the drug. According to the DEA, Mexico is a major global supplier of illicit Ketamine; India is also involved with the smuggling of ketamine to the US (Hoggins et al., 2016). Ketamine is commercially available in an aqueous form, which is usually injected, but once the Ketamine goes through a dehydration process, it becomes a powder which can then be illicitly distributed in capsules, tablets, crystals, or the powder itself (Sassano-Hoggins et al., 2016). To make connections across chemical and personal levels, I am first going to reiterate some information stated earlier. Ketamine antagonizes NMDA, which means that Ketamine effectively blocks the receptor for NMDA – the neurotransmitter that modulates learning and memory. So, because chronic Ketamine users are constantly blocking the learning and memory neurotransmitter (NMDA), it is likely that there will be some form of modification, or perhaps even deficit, in learning and memory. As an example, let’s say that there is a student who uses Ketamine chronically, but still goes to class every day. Unless this student is taking notes, the student will likely not remember the information discussed in class because any information accumulated would have a difficult time being retained due to the antagonization of the NMDA receptor, thus creating a learning deficit that may last for as long as the individual continues to take Ketamine. This learning deficit could be one of the factors determining if an individual continues to pursue an education. According to the same data set of n=249 individuals, there is, in fact, a correlation between education and the amount of Ketamine used in their lifetime. Of the group of individuals that took less than 10 doses of Ketamine, 71% of them pursued a post-secondary education. Of the group that took 10 doses or more of Ketamine, only 24% of them pursued a post-secondary education (Reynaud-Maurupt et al., 2007). In conclusion, Ketamine, like most drugs, has practical clinical uses, but also has a high potential for recreational use and abuse. It is important to develop a knowledge of this, and other drugs, because so long as there are animals called humans that walk this planet, there will always be a demand for psychoactive & mild altering drugs. Whether for clinical reasons, or personal reasons, the more knowledge you have about a specific drug or drugs, the better equipped you will be to handle the situations in which those drugs are involved in. WORKS CITED Li, L., & Vlisides, P. E. (2016). Ketamine: 50 Years of Modulating the Mind. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 612. Reynaud-Maurupt, C., Bello, P. Y., Akoka, S., & Toufik, A. (2007) Characteristics and Behaviors of Ketamine Users in France in 2003. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 39,1. Sassano-Hoggins, S., Baron, D., Juarez, G., Esmaili N., & Gold, M. (2016). A Review of Ketamine Abuse and Diversion. Depression and Anxiety, 33, 718-727. |
- DaveThoughts into words. Archives
May 2021
Categories |